Almader-Salas

United States v. Almader-Salas

Good Law
199 F. App'x 597
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 25, 2006No. 05-10792California312 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Jorge Alberto Almader-Salas appeals from the sentence imposed following his guilty plea to being found in the United States after illegal reentry, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 (a). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm.

Almader-Salas first contends that the district court erred by declining to consider his argument that the disparity between his sentences, and the sentences imposed on similarly-situated defendants who are prosecuted in districts with fast-track programs, is unwarranted and renders his sentences unreasonable. He further contends that this disparity violates his equal protection rights. These contentions are foreclosed by this court’s holding in United States v. Marcial-Santiago, 447 F.3d 715, 717-19 (9th Cir.2006).

Almader-Salas next contends that the district court erred by sentencing him to a term of 41 months when he only pled to the elements of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 (a), which carries a maximum sentence of two years. He also contends that Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224 , 118 S.Ct. 1219 , 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), is no longer good law in light of the intervening Supreme Court decision Shepard v. United States,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.