Meyer

MEMORANDUM **

William Meyer and Diane Meyer appeal pro se from the Tax Court’s summary judgment in favor of the Commissioner of Internal Revenue (“Commissioner”) in their action contesting deficiencies for tax years 1996 and 1997. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 7482 . We review de novo the grant of summary judgment, Hansen v. United States, 7 F.3d 137, 138 *677 (9th Cir.1993) (per curiam), and review for abuse of discretion the imposition of sanctions, Wolf v. Commissioner, 4 F.3d 709, 716 (9th Cir.1993). We affirm.

We reject appellants’ contention that the Commissioner failed to comply with 26 U.S.C. § 6303 (a), which requires the Commissioner to issue a notice and demand after the assessment is made, because the Forms 4340 were presumptive evidence that taxpayers were provided with intents to levy, amongst other forms of notice. See Hughes v. United States, 953 F.2d 531, 536 (9th Cir.1992) (notices of intent to levy satisfy the notice and demand requirement of section 6303(a)); Hansen, 7 F.3d at 138 (holding that Form 4340 shows, in the absence of contrary evidence, that a notice and demand was properly made).

The Tax Court did not abuse its discretion by…