Montepeque-Peralta

United States v. Montepeque-Peralta

Good Law
201 F. App'x 453
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 13, 2006No. 05-50385California756 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Jaime Enrique Montepeque-Peralta (“Montepeque”) appeals his sentence following a judgment and conviction for violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 , being a deported alien found in the United States. In a previous appeal, we concluded that the district court “clearly erred when it denied [an] additional reduction for timely acceptance of responsibility” without first determining whether the government meaningfully prepared for trial prior to Montepeque’s notice of intent to plead guilty. See United States v. Montepeque-Peralta, 116 Fed.Appx. 853 (9th Cir.2004) (unpublished disposition). We remanded for resentencing on an open record. Id. On remand, the district court reviewed evidence of the government’s trial preparation and found that “[b]asically the only thing that was left to do was to put the witnesses on the stand and go through the trial itself.” The district court once again denied Montepeque a third point adjustment for acceptance of responsibility and sentenced Montepeque to 77 months in custody.

In this appeal, Montepeque argues that the government did not carry its burden of demonstrating that it meaningfully prepared for trial. In light of evidence that the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.