Bahamondes

United States v. Bahamondes

Good Law
201 F. App'x 493
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 14, 2006No. 05-50419California254 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

George Bahamondes appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 63-month sentence for conspiracy, aiding and abetting, and making false statements, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2 , 371, and 1001.

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 *494 (1967), counsel for Bahamondes has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Bahamondes filed a declaration of trial counsel indicating a potential issue for appeal.

Because our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 82-83 , 109 S.Ct. 346 , 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), indicates that Bahamondes knowingly and voluntarily waived his right to appeal and was sentenced within the terms of the plea agreement, we enforce the waiver and dismiss the appeal. See United States v. Nguyen, 235 F.3d 1179 , 1182 (9th Cir.2000) (stating that an appeal waiver is valid when it is entered knowingly and voluntarily); see also United States v. Cardenas, 405 F.3d 1046, 1048 (9th Cir. 2005) (noting that the changes in sentencing law imposed by United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 , 125 S.Ct. 738 , 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005),…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.