Medina-Aispuro

United States v. Medina-Aispuro

Good Law
201 F. App'x 524
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 14, 2006No. 05-30158, 05-30159California319 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Isau Medina-Aispuro appeals from his 87-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea convictions for illegal re-entry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 , and distribution of five or more grams of actual methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 (a)(1) and (b)(l)(B)(viii). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm and remand.

Appellant contends that his plea was not knowing or voluntary because he did not sign the plea letter until sentencing. We disagree. The totality of the circumstances surrounding the plea indicate that appellant was fully aware of (1) the direct consequences of pleading guilty, and (2) his alternative options, and the court complied with Fed.R.Crim.P. 11 during the plea colloquy. See United States v. Kaczynski, 239 F.3d 1108, 1114 (9th Cir.2001). Accordingly, appellant’s plea was voluntary. See Brady v. United States, 397 U.S. 742, 755 , 90 S.Ct. 1463 , 25 L.Ed.2d 747 (1970).

Appellant’s remaining contentions are belied by the record.

In accordance with United States v. Rivera-Sanchez, 222 F.3d 1057, 1062 (9th Cir. 2000), we remand case number 05-30158 to the district court with…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.