Parks

Parks v. Commissioner

Good Law
201 F. App'x 553
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 15, 2006No. 05-70783California131 words

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Wayne Parks appeals pro se from the Tax Court’s dismissal of his “small tax” action. We dismiss for lack of jurisdiction.

Under I.R.C. § 746303), a decision entered in a “small tax” case “shall not be reviewed in any other court.” Cole v. Comm’r, 958 F.2d 288, 289 (9th Cir.1992); see also 26 U.S.C. § 7481 (b). Because Parks’ case involved a disputed amount of less than $50,000 and he consented to its designation as a “small tax” case, we dismiss Parks’ appeal from the Tax Court’s decision. See 26 U.S.C. § 7463 (a); Cole, 958 F.2d at 289-90 .

DISMISSED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.