Carrillo-Martinez

United States v. Carrillo-Martinez

Good Law
203 F. App'x 114
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 17, 2006No. 05-50706California88 words

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

A review of the record and the opening brief indicates that the questions raised in *115 this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard).

Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court’s judgment. Al pending motions are denied as moot.

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.