Cook
United States v. Cook
Lead Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Stephen Earl Cook appeals from the district court’s order revoking his super *153 vised release and imposing a one-year term of imprisonment.
Cook’s counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), stating that she finds no meritorious issues for review.
When Cook completed his sentence upon revocation of supervised release, there ceased to be a case or controversy. See United States v. Palomba, 182 F.3d 1121, 1123 (9th Cir.1999). Accordingly, this appeal is moot. See Spencer v. Kemna, 523 U.S. 1, 14 , 118 S.Ct. 978 , 140 L.Ed.2d 43 (1998); Palomba, 182 F.3d at 1123 & n. 3.
We GRANT counsel’s motion to withdraw.
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the *153 courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.