Hovannisyan

Hovannisyan v. Gonzales

Good Law
203 F. App'x 796
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 23, 2006No. 04-74376California261 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Hyak Hovannisyan, a native and citizen of Armenia, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s order denying his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for substantial evidence, Gormley v. Ashcroft, 364 F.3d 1172, 1176 (9th Cir.2004), and we deny the petition for review.

Hovannisyan testified that Communist party members beat and threatened him because he was a messenger for a former party official and his attackers wanted information about the documents he delivered. Neither Hovannisyan’s testimony, nor any other evidence in the record, compels the conclusion that this mistreatment occurred, even in part, on account of his actual or imputed political opinion. See id. at 1177 (upholding agency determination where petitioner failed to demonstrate that perpetrators victimized him on account of a protected ground).

Because Hovannisyan failed to establish eligibility for asylum, he necessarily failed to meet the more stringent standard for withholding of removal. See…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.