Flores

Flores v. Rzeslawski

Good Law
204 F. App'x 580
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 23, 2006Nos. 06-15378, 06-15556, 06-15558, 06-15951, 06-15952California303 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM *

This case deals with the consolidated appeals of several district court orders. The first several orders found the State of Arizona in civil contempt of the district court’s previous order to reform the State’s English Language Learner (ELL) program, enjoined administration of the AIMS test to ELL students as a requirement for graduation until the program had been reformed, and provided for the distribution of the fines collected to school districts to fund ELL programs. The second order rejected House Bill 2064, determining it failed to comply with the court’s original order.

In the interim, the landscape of educational funding has changed significantly. We have held that, because “the scope of federal relief against an agency of state government must always be narrowly tailored to enforce federal constitutional and statutory law only .... federal courts must be sensitive to the need for modification [of permanent injunctive relief] when circumstances change.” 1 In light of the changes in education programs and funding since the original 2000 court order, the district court should have held an evidentiary hearing and made findings of fact regarding whether changed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.