Shao

Shao v. Gonzales

Good Law
204 F. App'x 689
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 8, 2006No. 05-75278California265 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Lianghe Shao, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of China, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s order denying Shao’s applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . Reviewing for substantial evidence, Chebchoub v. INS, 257 F.3d 1038, 1042 (9th Cir.2001), we deny the petition for review.

The BIA found Shao not credible based upon inconsistent statements regarding the circumstances of his alleged release from detention, his knowledge of his mother-in-law’s arrest, and the year in which *690 the events he alleged precipitated his departure from China occurred. These inconsistencies go to the heart of his claim and support the BIA’s adverse credibility finding. See id. at 1043 . Because there was adequate reason to question Shao’s credibility, the BIA properly considered Shao’s lack of persuasive corroborative evidence. See id. at 1044 . Accordingly, Shao faded to establish eligibility for asylum or withholding of removal. See Farah v. Ashcroft, 348 F.3d 1153, 1156 (9th…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.