Herrera-Lemus

Herrera-Lemus v. Gonzales

Good Law
205 F. App'x 499
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 9, 2006No. 05-70035California304 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Gilma Herrera-Lemus, a native and citizen of Honduras, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) December 3, 2004 order denying her motion to reconsider its September 13, 2004 order affirming, without opinion, an immigration judge’s decision denying her applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture. To the extent we have jurisdiction, it is conferred by 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reconsider. Oh v. Gonzales, 406 F.3d 611, 612 (9th Cir.2005). We dismiss in part and deny in part the petition for review.

In her opening brief, prepared by former counsel, Herrera-Lemus challenges only the BIA’s underlying order of September 13, 2004. We lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s underlying order because the instant petition for review is not timely as to that order. See Martinez-Serrano v. INS, 94 F.3d 1256, 1258 (9th Cir.1996).

Herrera-Lemus fails to address, and therefore has waived any challenge to, the BIA’s December 3, 2004 order denying her motion to reconsider on the ground that she failed to show any error in the BIA’s underlying…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.