Kent

Kent v. Tosatto

Good Law
205 F. App'x 602
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 14, 2006No. 06-55578California309 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Paul F. Kent appeals pro se the district court’s order denying his request for issuance of an arrest warrant for his vessel Lion of Judah and dismissing his complaint in admiralty against San Diego Harbor Police Officer Laura Tosatto for lack of in rem jurisdiction pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we review de novo. See United States v. 2,164 Watches, 366 F.3d 767 , 770 (9th Cir.2004). We affirm the district court’s judgment.

In his complaint, Kent alleged that, at Tosatto’s direction, the vessel was seized from its anchorage in navigable waters in San Diego Bay and impounded for a violation of a permit ordinance. He claimed that the ordinance was invalid because it was superceded by federal law governing navigable waters of the United States. He sought injunctive and declaratory relief ordering the return of the vessel, and he asked the district court to issue a warrant for the vessel’s seizure.

Pursuant to Rule C(3)(a)(ii)(A) of the Supplemental Rules for Certain Admiralty and Maritime Claims, the district court must issue an arrest warrant for a vessel “[i]f the conditions for an in rem action appear to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.