Maki
United States v. Maki
Opinion
Lead Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
James Curtis Maki appeals from the district court’s order revoking his supervised release and imposing a 50-month term of imprisonment. Maki was originally convicted of conspiracy to manufacture and distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 , manufacture of methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1), possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1), possession of a listed essential chemical with intent to manufacture methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (d)(1), and maintaining a place for manufacture or distribution of methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 856 (a)(1).
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Maki has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Maki filed a pro se supplemental brief, and the government filed an answering brief.
Our independent review of the briefs and the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83 , 109 S.Ct. 346 , 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief.