Bach

MEMORANDUM ***

John Bach, a former practicing lawyer, appeals pro se the district court’s judgment in favor of defendants in his action asserting claims pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981 , 1982, 1983, 1985, and 1986, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961-64 , California statutory law, and Idaho statutory and common law. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review de novo the district court’s grant of summary judgment, see Morrison v. Hall, 261 F.3d 896, 900 (9th Cir.2001), and its dismissal for failure to state a claim. See Nelson v. Heiss, 271 F.3d 891, 893 (9th Cir.2001). We affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment because Bach failed to raise a genuine issue of material fact as to any of his claims against Donald Harris, Shan Perry, and Charles Homer, individually and d/b/a Holden, Kidwell, Hahn & Crapo. Bach also failed to raise a genuine issue of material fact as to his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim against Colin Luke, Ryan Kaufman, Laura Lowry and Teton County. *769 See Delta Savings Bank v. United States, 265 F.3d 1017, 1021 (9th Cir.2001).

The district court did not err in dismissing with prejudice all of Bach’s remaining federal claims for failure to state a…