Maravou

Maravou v. Gonzales

Good Law
207 F. App'x 775
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 15, 2006No. 04-75110California311 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Siteri Maravou, her husband Mosese Maravou and their daughter, Merewalesi Adivukivu Ki Maravou, all natives and citizens of Fiji, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order affirming without opinion an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying their applications for asylum. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review the agency’s factual findings for substantial evidence, and reverse only if the evidence compels a contrary finding. See Halaim v. INS, 358 F.3d 1128, 1131 (9th Cir.2004). We deny the petition for review.

The petitioners’ testimony regarding their brief detentions during and immediately after the 1987 coup does not compel a finding of past persecution. See id. at 1132 (stating that “[persecution is an extreme concept that does not include every sort of treatment our society regards as offensive”) (internal quotations omitted). Moreover, that the petitioners were fired from their respective jobs allegedly as a result of their political opinions does not amount to past persecution. See Nagoulko v. INS, 333 F.3d 1012, 1016 (9th Cir.2003) (“That Nagoulko was fired from her job as a kindergarten teacher because…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.