Topuzyan

Topuzyan v. Gonzales

Good Law
207 F. App'x 804
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 15, 2006No. 05-75156California277 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Arsen Topuzyan, a native of Russia and citizen of Armenia, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his applications for asylum, withholding of removal and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C § 1252. We review for substantial evidence, see Kaur v. Gonzales, 418 F.3d 1061, 1064 (9th Cir.2005), and we deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s adverse credibility determination based on critical omissions from Topuzyan’s asylum application, see Alvarez-Santos v. INS, 332 F.3d 1245, 1254 (9th Cir.2003), and a material inconsistency within his testimony, see Chebchoub v. INS, 257 F.3d 1038, 1043 (9th Cir.2001). Topuzyan failed to include in his asylum application that he was beaten unconscious while in police custody in 1995 and that his family continued to experience problems after his departure. Topuzyan’s testimony was also internally inconsistent regarding his alleged attempt to file a complaint with the Armenian police. Because these omissions and inconsistency go to the heart of his asylum…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.