Rodriguez-Martinez

United States v. Rodriguez-Martinez

Good Law
207 F. App'x 831
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 17, 2006No. 06-50114California344 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM *

The government filed an indictment against Defendant Diego Rodriguez-Martinez, charging him with one count of attempted entry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 . The district court dismissed the indictment pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 48(b). 1 The government filed a second indictment charging the same offense. Defendant moved to dismiss on grounds of double jeopardy, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The district court denied the motion, and Defendant timely appeals.

We have jurisdiction to review pretrial orders rejecting claims of double jeopardy under the collateral order exception to the final judgment rule. United States v. Castiglione, 876 F.2d 73, 75 (9th Cir.1988). On de novo review, United States v. Schwartz, 785 F.2d 673, 676 (9th Cir.1986), we affirm.

When an indictment is dismissed on the merits, double jeopardy precludes reindictment for the same charge. United States v. Cejas, 817 F.2d 595, 600 (9th Cir.1987). Additionally, a dismissal with prejudice under Rule 48(b) bars further prosecution of the same offense. Castiglione, 876 F.2d at 76 n. 1. But “[njormally, the dismissal of an indictment has no preclusive…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.