Taylor

Taylor v. Lewis

Good Law
208 F. App'x 510
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 13, 2006No. 04-17517California1,137 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

ORDER

The panel has decided to amend the memorandum filed on August 15, 2006. An amended memorandum is filed concurrently with this order.

With this amendment, the panel has voted unanimously to deny the petition for rehearing. Judges O’Scannlain and Thomas have voted to deny the petition for *511 rehearing en banc and Judge Goodwin so recommends.

The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc and no judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 35.

The petition for rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc are DENIED. No further petitions for rehearing or rehearing en banc may be filed.

AMENDED MEMORANDUM *

Andy Bernard Taylor appeals from the district court’s denial of his petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 . The facts and prior proceedings are known to the parties and are repeated herein only as necessary.

I

In a concurrently filed opinion, we deal with Taylor’s contention that the state court’s application of the Eighth Amendment’s proportionality principle was objectively unreasonable; this issue has been resolved there. See Taylor v. Lewis, No. 04-17517 (filed Aug. 15,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.