Noriega

United States v. Noriega

Good Law
208 F. App'x 565
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 29, 2006No. 06-10055California243 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM *

The United States appeals from the district court’s order granting Tom Daniel Noriega’s motion to suppress evidence seized during a search of his residence.

The mistake contained in the search warrant affidavit’s prayer did not support the district court’s finding that the magistrate failed to read the search warrant and its supporting affidavit. See United States v. Thomas, 447 F.3d 1191 , 1196 n. 7 (9th Cir.2006) (“Findings of fact underlying the district court’s determination are reviewed for clear error.”) (citation omitted).

There was no error in the warrant itself or in the body of the affidavit used to establish probable cause. The “cut and paste” error in the prayer was not material to the warrant or the existence of probable cause, and the motion to suppress should have been denied. See United States v. Chavez-Miranda, 306 F.3d 973, 978 (9th Cir.2002) (“When a magistrate judge issues a search warrant for a residence, he must find a reasonable nexus between the contraband sought and the residence. In making this determination, a magistrate judge need only find that it would be reasonable to seek the evidence there. Moreover, we have recognized that in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.