Noyola

Noyola v. Gonzales

Good Law
208 F. App'x 602
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 1, 2006No. 06-73730California245 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

We have reviewed the record and petitioners’ filings in this court. We conclude that petitioners have failed to raise a colorable constitutional or legal claim to invoke our jurisdiction over this petition for review under the REAL ID Act. See Torres-Aguilar v. INS, 246 F.3d 1267, 1271 (9th Cir.2001). Accordingly, respondent’s motion to dismiss this petition for review is granted as to petitioner, Florencia Analco Noyola, A79-519-097, because we lack jurisdiction to review the agency’s discretionary determination that petitioner did not demonstrate her removal would result in exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to a qualifying relative. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (a)(2)(B)(i); Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales, 424 F.3d 926, 929-30 (9th Cir.2005); Romero-Torres v. Ashcroft, 327 F.3d 887, 892 (9th Cir.2003).

Respondent’s motion to summarily affirm this petition is granted as to petitioner Diego Visoso Blanco, A79-519-098, because petitioner’s removal cannot result in “exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to the alien’s spouse, parent, or child, who is a U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident” as required for cancellation of removal because petitioner has no…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.