Kaur

Kaur v. Gonzales

Good Law
209 F. App'x 629
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 30, 2006No. 04-76752California263 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Harinder Singh Kaur (Singh), a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) affirming the denial by an immigration judge (IJ) of his requests for asylum and withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review the adverse credibility finding under the substantial evidence standard and will uphold the decision unless the evidence compels a contrary conclusion. See Singh v. Ashcroft, 367 F.3d 1139, 1143 (9th Cir.2004). We deny the petition.

Substantial evidence supports the adverse credibility determination. Singh’s testimony regarding material events, specifically his ascendency to area president of his political party, was internally inconsistent and implausible. See Singh-Kaur v. INS, 183 F.3d 1147, 1152-53 (9th Cir. 1999). Additionally, Singh submitted a document to corroborate his political party membership, and this document had Singh’s name obviously inserted into the letter. See Desta v. Ashcroft, 365 F.3d 741, 745 (9th Cir.2004) (petitioner submitted documents to show his alleged membership in a political party, the genuineness of these documents went to the heart…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.