Reynoso de Velasco v. Gonzales

Good Law
210 F. App'x 608
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 8, 2006No. 05-75659California149 words

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Andrea Reynoso de Velasco, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision affirming an immigration judge’s denial of her application for cancellation of removal. Because we lack jurisdiction, we dismiss.

We lack jurisdiction to consider Reynoso de Velasco’s challenge to the agency’s discretionary determination that she failed to demonstrate exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to her qualifying relatives. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (a)(2)(B)(i); Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales, 424 F.3d 926, 929-30 (9th Cir.2005). Moreover, Reynoso de Velasco has failed to raise a colorable constitutional or legal claim to invoke our jurisdiction over this petition for review. See Torres-Aguilar v. INS, 246 F.3d 1267, 1271 (9th Cir.2001).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.