Ruiz Pensamiento v. Gonzales

Good Law
210 F. App'x 619
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 8, 2006No. 05-71042California309 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Sarbelio Humberto Ruiz Pensamiento, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order affirming the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) order denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for substantial evidence and will grant the petition only if the evidence compels a contrary decision. INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481, 483-84 , 112 S.Ct. 812 , 117 L.Ed.2d 38 (1992). We deny the petition for review.

Ruiz Pensamiento presented no evidence that the deaths of his father and brother, both of which involved unknown assailants, occurred on account of his father’s position in the Guatemalan military. Moreover, Ruiz Pensamiento fails to establish that anyone imputed or would impute a political opinion to him based upon his father’s background. See Molina-Estrada v. INS, 293 F.3d 1089, 1094-95 (9th Cir.2002) (where petitioner presents evidence that his father was in the Guatemalan military, without evidence that his father held a political opinion, petitioner cannot establish that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.