Abd El Noor v. Gonzales

Good Law
210 F. App'x 623
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 8, 2006No. 05-73335California268 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Sherif Maher Abd El Noor, a native and citizen of Egypt, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . Reviewing for substantial evidence, Li v. Ashcroft, 378 F.3d 959, 962 (9th Cir.2004), we deny the petition for review.

The agency based its adverse credibility determination on a discrepancy between Abd El Noor’s written statement and his testimony regarding the timing and circumstances of his persecution by Egyptian national security officers. Because this discrepancy goes to the heart of Abd A1 Noor’s claim, and the agency adequately considered Abd El Noor’s proffered explanation for the discrepancy, substantial evidence supports the adverse credibility determination. See id. at 963-64 . Accordingly, Abd El Noor has failed to establish eligibility for asylum and withholding of removal. See id. at 964 .

Substantial evidence also supports the agency’s determination that Abd El Noor *624 is not entitled to CAT relief…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.