Salvador

Salvador v. Gonzales

Good Law
210 F. App'x 642
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 8, 2006No. 05-76064California265 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Leonilo Bustamante Salvador, a native and citizen of the Philippines, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings to seek adjustment of status based on an unapproved visa petition filed on his behalf by his U.S. citizen spouse. We review for abuse of discretion, Konstantinova v. INS, 195 F.3d 528, 529 (9th Cir.1999), and we grant the petition for review.

The BIA may grant a motion to reopen for adjustment of status based on a marriage entered into after the commencement of removal proceedings where there is clear and convincing evidence that the marriage is bona fide. See Malhi v. INS, 336 F.3d 989, 994 (9th Cir.2003) (“[I]n order to qualify for the bona fide marriage exemption, an applicant must offer evidence that is probative of the motivation for marriage, not just the bare fact of getting married”); Matter of Velarde-Pacheco, 23 I. & N. Dec. 253, 256 , 2002 WL *643 893173 (BIA 2002) (en banc); 8 C.F.R. § 204.2 (a)(l)(iii). Here, the BIA abused its discretion when it failed to explain why it found the evidence submitted by Salvador to be insufficient to meet the clear and convincing…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.