Velazquez

Velazquez v. Gonzales

Good Law
210 F. App'x 732
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 12, 2006No. 05-73533California231 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Leovigildo Velazquez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ summary affirmance of the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his application for asylum, withholding of removal and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s determination that, although Velazquez experienced past persecution in *733 1982, he failed to demonstrate a well-founded fear of future persecution, based on changed country conditions and the finding that the Mexican government is no longer dominated by one party and Velazquez’s political party controls legislative and governatorial positions in Mexico. See Gonzalez-Hernandez v. Ashcroft, 336 F.3d 995, 1000 (9th Cir.2003). Accordingly, Velazquez is not eligible for asylum.

Because Velazquez failed to demonstrate eligibility for asylum, it follows that he did not satisfy the more stringent standard for withholding of removal. See id. at 1001 n. 5.

Substantial evidence also supports the denial of CAT relief because Velazquez did not demonstrate that it is more likely…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.