Hernandez-Garcia

United States v. Hernandez-Garcia

Good Law
211 F. App'x 604
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 12, 2006No. 05-30398California227 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Roberto Hernandez-Garcia appeals from the 75-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for distribution of methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 (a)(1), (b)(1)(A). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we vacate and remand.

Hernandez-Garcia contends that the district court erred in concluding that he was ineligible for a minor role adjustment pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2. We agree.

Even though Hernandez-Garcia pleaded guilty to a less serious offense, the district court was still required to conduct a factual inquiry into the role of the defendant as compared to other participants. See U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2, application note 3; United States v. Demers, 13 F.3d 1381, 1383, 1385-86 (9th Cir.1994).

Thus, based on the sentencing transcript, and because the district court declined to assess the defendant’s culpability with respect to other participants in the criminal scheme, we vacate the sentence and remand to enable the district court to reconsider whether Hernandez-Garcia was a minor participant under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2. See 18 U.S.C. § 3742 (f)(1). In doing so, we do not suggest that the district court, in its exercise of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.