Mandoriao

Mandoriao v. Gonzales

Good Law
212 F. App'x 641
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 13, 2006No. 06-70870California240 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Jose Joel Mandoriao petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ affirmance of an order of deportation issued by an Immigration Judge. Because he raises a question of law, we have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (a)(2)(D). We deny the petition.

Under former INA § 321(a), a child could derive United States citizenship solely from his father’s naturalization if the parents were legally separated and the father had legal custody of the child. 1 The parents must have been legally separated at the time of the father’s naturalization, however. 2 Mandoriao’s parents were not legally separated at the time of his father’s naturalization. 3 Additionally, the record is *642 clear that Mandoriao’s father never had legal custody over him. Thus, Mandoriao did not derive United States citizenship when his father was naturalized.

PETITION DENIED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

. 8 U.S.C. § 1432 (a)(3) (repealed by the Child Citizenship Act of 2000, Pub.L. No. 106-395, 114 Stat. 1631).

. See Minasyan v. Gonzales, 401 F.3d 1069,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.