Velasquez-Vera

United States v. Velasquez-Vera

Good Law
212 F. App'x 651
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 13, 2006No. 05-10211California239 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Fernando Velasquez-Vera appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 30-month sentence imposed for illegal re-entry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 .

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Velasquez-Vera has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. No pro se supplemental brief has been filed.

Because our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 *652 U.S. 75, 82-83 , 109 S.Ct. 346 , 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), indicates that Velasquez-Vera knowingly and voluntarily waived his right to appeal and was sentenced within the terms of the plea agreement, we enforce the waiver and dismiss the appeal. See United States v. Nguyen, 235 F.3d 1179, 1182 (9th Cir.2000) (stating that an appeal waiver is valid when it is entered knowingly and voluntarily); see also United States v. Cardenas, 405 F.3d 1046, 1048 (9th Cir.2005) (noting that the changes in sentencing law imposed by United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 , 125 S.Ct. 738 , 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), did not render waiver of appeal involuntary and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.