Kedekein

United States v. Kedekein

Good Law
217 F. App'x 639
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 11, 2007No. 05-10520California244 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Shayne Kedekein appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 60-month sentence imposed for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute 500 grams or more of cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 (a)(1), (b)(l)(B)(ii), and 846.

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Kedekein has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Kedekein filed a pro se supplemental brief. No answering brief has been filed.

Because our independent review of the record and briefs pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 82-83 , 109 S.Ct. 346 , 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), indicates that Kedekein knowingly and voluntarily waived his right to appeal and was sentenced within the terms of the plea agreement, we enforce the waiver and dismiss the appeal. See United States v. Nguyen, 235 F.3d 1179, 1182 (9th Cir.2000) (stating that an appeal waiver is valid when it is entered knowingly and voluntarily); see also United States v. Cardenas, 405 F.3d 1046, 1048 (9th Cir.2005) (noting that the changes in sentencing law imposed by United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 , 125 S.Ct. 738…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.