Bakhtiari

Bakhtiari v. Gonzales

Good Law
218 F. App'x 602
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 16, 2007No. 05-74052California262 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Parviz Ghassemi Bakhtiari, his wife Narges Jey (lead petitioner), and their son Mehrdad Ghassemi Bakhtiari, natives and citizens of Iran, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order affirming an Immigration Judge’s decision denying their application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 and we review for substantial evidence. Li v. Ashcroft, 378 F.3d 959, 962 (9th Cir.2004). We deny the petition for review.

Jey testified that she fears persecution by the Iranian government on account of her conversion from Islam to Christianity. Jey’s testimony contained major discrepancies, however, regarding the time line of events and when she was arrested for practicing Christianity in relation to both the 1979 regime change and in relation to her departure from Iran. The discrepancies concern pivotal events and constitute substantial evidence to support the BIA’s adverse credibility determination. See Chebchoub v. INS, 257 F.3d 1038, 1043 (9th Cir.2001).

In the absence of credible evidence, petitioners have failed to show eligibility for asylum or…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.