Macavilca-Parco

Macavilca-Parco v. Gonzales

Good Law
218 F. App'x 611
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 16, 2007No. 05-75400California332 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

*612 MEMORANDUM **

Domingo German Macavilca-Parco, a native and citizen of Peru, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order affirming the Immigration Judge’s decision denying his applications for withholding of removal and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for substantial evidence, Nagoulko v. INS, 333 F.3d 1012, 1015 (9th Cir.2003), and we deny in part and grant in part the petition for review and remand.

Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s conclusion that the record evidence, including the magistrate court’s report, is insufficient to establish past persecution for the purposes of withholding of removal because the only physical harm suffered by Macavilca-Parco was a single beating perpetrated by unknown assailants. See Hoxha v. Ashcroft, 319 F.3d 1179, 1182 (9th Cir.2003) (one beating not connected to any particular threat did not compel a finding of past persecution).

Nevertheless, the BIA failed to address Macavilca-Parco’s claim that it is more likely than not that he would be subject to persecution if removed to Peru. See Al-Harbi v. INS, 242 F.3d 882, 888 (9th…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.