Clugston

Clugston v. Smith

Good Law
218 F. App'x 683
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 18, 2007No. 06-35755California74 words

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Appellees’ motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard).

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. All pending motions are denied as moot.

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.