Perrigo-Haddon

United States v. Perrigo-Haddon

Good Law
221 F. App'x 619
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 23, 2007No. 06-30149California711 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Julie Perrigo-Haddon appeals her sentence of two years probation, 100 hours community service, and a $100 special assessment imposed by the district court after her guilty plea to the charge of misprision of a felony, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 4 . Perrigo-Haddon contends she was denied effective assistance of counsel during sentencing proceedings.

She alleges her trial attorney rendered ineffective assistance by (1) attacking the *621 credibility of prosecution witnesses in objections to the presentence investigation report, (2) failing to ensure Perrigo-Haddon’s initial statement to probation was sufficient to entitle her to a downward sentencing adjustment for acceptance of responsibility, (8) failing to prepare Perrigo-Haddon to give a statement at the sentencing hearing, (4) failing to present mitigating evidence or make an argument for leniency at the sentencing hearing, and (5) failing to adequately prepare Perrigo-Haddon for the sentence she would receive.

We generally do not review ineffective assistance of counsel claims on direct appeal, preferring instead to wait until the record has been more fully developed in the habeas corpus context before…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.