Valenzuela-Rodelo
United States v. Valenzuela-Rodelo
Lead Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Jesus Valenzuela-Rodelo appeals from his conviction and 80-month sentence following a jury trial conviction for illegal reentry following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 .
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Valenzuela-Rodelo’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw *663 as counsel of record. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81 , 109 S.Ct. 346 , 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.