Ortega

Ortega v. Gonzales

Good Law
222 F. App'x 610
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 26, 2007No. 06-74416California288 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Azucena Morales Ortega petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order affirming the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying petitioner’s motion to terminate and finding her removable because she engaged in alien smuggling in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (a)(6)(E)(i).

We review the BIA’s findings of fact for substantial evidence. See Moran v. Ashcroft, 395 F.3d 1089 (9th Cir.2005). In addition, as the BIA accepted the IJ’s findings of fact, we review the IJ’s deci *611 sion, as part of the BIA’s. See Alarcon-Serrano v. INS, 220 F.3d 1116 (9th Cir. 2000). Petitioner testified that she was aware that her cousin, the smuggled alien, lacked legal documentation to cross the border, she told her cousin to lay down and covered him with a blanket after an immigration officer entered their van for inspection. Thus, the record provides substantial evidence to support the BIA’s conclusion that petitioner was removable under 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (a)(6)(E)(i). See Moran v. Ashcroft, 395 F.3d 1089 (9th Cir. 2005).

The petition for review and motion for stay of removal fail to raise any legal arguments regarding the BIA’s decision. The respondent filed a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.