Chaube
Chaube v. Gonzales
222 F. App'x 627
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 26, 2007No. 06-74092California73 words
Lead Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Respondent’s unopposed motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). Accordingly, this petition for review is denied.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.