Longrong Liang v. Gonzales

Good Law
223 F. App'x 617
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 28, 2007No. 05-70467California429 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Longrong Liang, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing her appeal from the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) order denying her motion to reopen proceedings in which she was ordered removed in absentia. We review the denial of a motion to reopen for abuse of discretion, Lara-Torres v. Ashcroft, 383 F.3d 968, 972 (9th Cir.2004), amended by 404 F.3d 1105 (9th Cir.2005), and review findings of fact regarding ineffective assistance of counsel for substantial evidence, Lin v. Ashcroft, 377 F.3d 1014, 1024 (9th Cir.2004). We grant the petition for review.

An alien who is ordered removed during proceedings conducted in absentia may move to reopen to rescind the in absentia order if she can demonstrate that she failed to attend due to exceptional circumstances. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(b)(5)(C)(i). This court has recognized that ineffective assistance of counsel by a non-attorney representing himself as an attorney may qualify as an exceptional circumstance. See Lopez v. INS, 184 F.3d 1097, 1100 (9th Cir.1999). Contrary to the IJ’s determination, Liang demonstrated compliance with *619 the procedural…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.