Tri-Villa Trust v. Universal Studios, Inc.

Good Law
224 F. App'x 608
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 7, 2007No. 05-55026California300 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM ***

Appellant Tri-Villa Trust appeals the district court’s order awarding attorneys’ fees of $56,000 under the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. § 505 , to Appellees Universal Studios and Esposito. The district court abused its discretion because it failed to provide any reason or explanation for the order and did not identify the legal standard for determining whether attorneys’ fees are proper under 17 U.S.C. § 505 . Accordingly, we vacate the award and remand to the district court to reconsider whether attorneys’ fees are warranted. Pfingston v. Ronan Eng’g Co., 284 F.3d 999 , 1006 (9th Cir.2002); Schikore v. BankAmerica Supp. Ret. Plan, 269 F.3d 956, 961 (9th Cir.2001); McCulloch v. Albert E. Price, Inc., 823 F.2d 316, 323 (9th Cir.1987); see also Mattel Inc. v. Walking Mountain Prods., 353 F.3d 792 , 815-16 (9th Cir.2003).

On remand, the district court shall exercise its discretion under 17 U.S.C. § 505 to determine whether an award of attorneys’ fees is appropriate, and make detailed findings. Pfingston, 284 F.3d at 1006. In determining whether an award of attorneys’ fees is appropriate, the district court shall consider the non-exclusive factors set forth in Wall Data…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.