Colima-Aguirre

Colima-Aguirre v. Gonzales

Good Law
224 F. App'x 632
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 12, 2007No. 04-70542California308 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM *

This petition comes to us from the denial by the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) of a motion to remand to the Immigration Court to seek consideration of new evidence weighing upon the petitioner’s request for “special rule” cancellation of removal pursuant to § 240A(b)(l) of the Immigration and Nationality Act. The new evidence arose from an incident that allegedly occurred after the adverse decision of the Immigration Judge that was then on appeal to the BIA. The evidence consisted of allegations supported with documentation that the petitioner’s permanent resident husband had recently (1) battered both her and her U.S. citizen daughter, and (2) subjected her daughter to “extreme cruelty.” The petitioner claimed that this new evidence entitled her to cancellation of removal pursuant to § 240A(b)(2) of the Act.

The BIA denied the motion to remand, indicating (1) that the evidence offered was insufficient to trigger § 240A(b)(2), and (2) that she had failed to demonstrate the “extreme hardship” requirement of the section.

Because the evidence submitted in support of the motion addresses a ground distinct from that considered by the Immigration Court such as to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.