Rodriguez-Duran

Rodriguez-Duran v. Gonzales

Good Law
225 F. App'x 459
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 14, 2007No. 04-70724California336 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Juan De Dios Rodriguez-Duran petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ affirmance without opinion of the Immigration Judge’s denial of his request for cancellation of removal due to his 1992 aggravated felony conviction under California Penal Code section 288(a). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (a)(2)(D), and we deny the petition.

The doctrine of res judicata does not preclude the IJ from considering Rodriguez’s 1992 conviction for violating California Penal Code section 288(a). Rodriguez contends that the government unsuccessfully attempted to remove him in 1992 based on the same conviction and the termination of those proceedings in his favor is a final judgment barring relitigation of the conviction now. Rodriguez mischaracterizes the 1992 proceedings. There, the Order to Show Cause (OSC) charged him with deportability under former INA § 241(a)(1)(B), 8 U.S.C. § 1251 (a)(1)(B), as an alien who entered the United States without inspection. Although the OSC recited the 1992 conviction, it was not charged as a basis for deportation, as prior counsel recognized in Rodriguez’s unopposed Motion to Terminate proceedings, which was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.