Carrillo
Directv, Inc. v. Carrillo
Opinion
Lead Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Defendant/Appellant Victor Carrillo (“Carrillo”) appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of PlaintiffAppellee Directv, Inc. (“Directv”). The court found Carrillo liable for violations of the Federal Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 605 , the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. § 1201 , and the Federal Wiretap Laws, 18 U.S.C. § 2512 , for his possession and transference of equipment used to pirate satellite TV.
Carrillo contends that the district court erred in extending the deadline for Directv’s filing of its summary judgment motion and that the district court erred in granting summary judgment. We affirm.
I. The district court did not abuse its discretion in amending the briefing order.
A district court’s decision regarding the management of litigation is re *590 viewed for abuse of discretion. Muckleshoot Tribe v. Lummi Indian Tribe, 141 F.3d 1355, 1358 (9th Cir.1998) (citing O’Neill v. United States, 50 F.3d 677, 687 (9th Cir.1995)). In this case, the district court did not abuse its discretion.
The delay in deposing Carrillo established good cause under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(b)(1) for granting the extension.…