Valencia Lopez v. Gonzales

Good Law
227 F. App'x 597
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 4, 2007No. 04-72235California342 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Jose Valencia Lopez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review from the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) summary affirmance without opinion of an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) finding that he had been convicted of an aggravated felony and a controlled substances offense. We have jurisdiction to consider the questions of law raised in the petition. 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (a)(2)(D); see also Fernandez-Ruiz v. Gonzales, 466 F.3d 1121, 1124 (9th Cir. 2006) (en banc).

Valencia Lopez primarily argues that because a conviction under Cal. Health & Safety Code § 11352 (a) is not a categorical aggravated felony under United States v. Rivera-Sanchez, 247 F.3d 905, 909 (9th Cir.2001) (en banc), the government was required to prove that the judicially noticeable facts “unequivocally establish” that he was convicted of an aggravated felony. He contends that the government did not meet this burden.

We need not resolve that question because the IJ also found Valencia Lopez removable as an alien convicted of a law relating to a controlled substance. See 8 U.S.C. § 1227 (a)(2)(B)(i). If that determination was correct, Valencia Lopez is ineligible for cancellation of removal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.