Watkins

Watkins v. George

Good Law
227 F. App'x 614
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 9, 2007No. 06-55345California92 words

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

The court has reviewed appellees’ motion for summary affirmance, appellants’ opposition thereto, the record and appellants’ opening brief. The questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). The district court properly dismissed appellants’ complaint.

Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court’s judgment.

All pending motions are denied as moot.

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.