Sarkisian

Sarkisian v. Gonzales

Good Law
228 F. App'x 654
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 27, 2007No. 05-73875California244 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Narine Yegorovna Sarkisian, a native and citizen of Armenia, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing her appeal from an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying her motion to reopen deportation proceedings. To the extent we have jurisdiction it is pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review the BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen for an abuse of discretion, Rodriguez-Lariz v. INS, 282 F.3d 1218, 1222 (9th Cir.2002), and we deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Sarkisian’s motion to reopen, based on her having become a Jehovah’s Witness, as the motion was untimely, and the change in Sarkisian’s personal circumstances did not qualify her for an exception to the filing deadline. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.23 (b)(4)(i).

We do not review the IJ’s decision because our review is limited to the BIA’s order. See Shah v. INS, 220 F.3d 1062, 1067 (9th Cir.2000) (holding that where the BIA’s review is de novo, this court’s review is limited to the BIA’s decision except to the extent the IJ’s decision is expressly adopted).

Finally, Sarkisian’s due process claim fails because…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.