Ruiz-Silva

United States v. Ruiz-Silva

Good Law
228 F. App'x 749
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 19, 2007No. 06-50411California269 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Francisco Ruiz-Silva appeals from the 75-month sentence imposed following his conviction for being a deported alien found in the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 (a). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we remand this case for further proceedings consistent with United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc).

Appellant contends that he should receive resentencing because he was sentenced at a time when the United States Sentencing Guidelines were mandatory, in violation of United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 , 125 S.Ct. 738 , 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). Because the district court vacated and reentered judgment, his conviction is “not yet final” on direct review, and so he is entitled to the benefit of the Booker decision. See Griffith v. Kentucky, 479 U.S. 314, 323 , 107 S.Ct. 708 , 93 L.Ed.2d 649 (1987); see also United States v. LaFromboise, 427 F.3d 680, 683 (9th Cir.2005) (noting that a conviction is not final without an amended judgment of conviction). Accordingly, we remand this case to the district court for the limited purpose of determining whether, if it had known that the Guidelines were advisory, it would have…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.