Singh
Singh v. Gonzales
Opinion
Lead Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Kulvir Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order affirming the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his application for asylum, withholding of removal and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252 , and we deny the petition for review.
Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s adverse credibility determination based on internal consistencies in Singh’s testimony and inconsistencies between his testimony and his identification documents, which go to the heart of his asylum claim. See Farah v. Ashcroft, 348 F.3d 1153, 1156 (9th Cir.2003); Pal v. INS, 204 F.3d 935, 940 (9th Cir.2000). Accordingly, Singh is not eligible for asylum.
Because Singh failed to establish eligibility for asylum, he necessarily failed to meet the more stringent standard for withholding of removal. See Farah at 1156 .
Because Singh did not raise the issue of CAT in his opening brief, he has waived this claim and we decline to review it. See Martinez-Serrano v. INS, 94 F.3d 1256, 1259-60 (9th Cir.1996).