King

MEMORANDUM *

David R. King appeals from his conviction of one count of conspiracy to obtain computer access to financial records, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371 , two counts of aiding and abetting the unlawful use of another’s identity, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1028 (a)(7), and 26 counts of aiding and abetting bank fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1344 (2). The facts and prior proceedings are known to the parties and are repeated herein only as necessary.

I

In a concurrently filed opinion, we deal with King’s contention that his right to a speedy trial under either the Speedy Trial Act or the Sixth Amendment was violated; such issue has been resolved there. See United States v. King, 483 F.3d 969 (9th Cir.2007).

II

King next argues that the district court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence obtained from two automobiles, a Chrysler Sebring and a Ford Thunderbird, during the execution of a search warrant. In reviewing the validity of a warrant, our task is “to ensure that the magistrate had ‘a substantial basis ... for concluding that probable cause existed.’ ” Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 236 , 103 S.Ct. 2317 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983) (quoting Jones v.…