Parrish

United States v. Parrish

Good Law
231 F. App'x 573
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 1, 2007Nos. 06-50060, 06-50063California335 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM ***

In a previous appeal, this court affirmed the convictions of Ronald Adair Parrish and Richard Lee Carlisle Jr., and remanded pursuant to United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc). United States v. Parrish, 134 Fed.Appx. 183 (9th Cir.2005). In this appeal, Parrish and Carlisle raise the same issues presented in their first appeal. With the exception of their sentences, which are reviewed for reasonableness under Ameline, 409 F.3d at 1079 , this court declines to reconsider issues decided in the prior appeal. United States v. Scrivner, 189 F.3d 825, 827 (9th Cir.1999) (under the law of the case doctrine, one appellate panel generally will not reconsider questions decided by another panel on a prior appeal in the same case). This court also declines to consider their ineffective assistance of counsel claim because it is not supported by any argument. Fed. R.App. P. 28(a)(9); United States v. Williamson, 439 F.3d 1125, 1138 (9th Cir.2006).

On limited remand, the district judge considered the sentencing guidelines and the 18 U.S.C. § 3553 (a) factors; she concluded the previously imposed sentences would not have differed materially had the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.